Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:55:18 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.freebsd.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __P macro question Message-ID: <p05101220b87e3dcefe28@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020130144557.A72262@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> <67461.1012429973@winston.freebsd.org> <20020130144557.A72262@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2:45 PM -0800 1/30/02, David O'Brien wrote: >On Wed, Jan 30, 2002, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > You didn't address any of the other good points he made. > >I only wanted to squash this point which I felt very much gave >the wrong impression and was inaccurate. Yeah, my reference to the "blanks update" probably didn't come across quite the way I intended it to. I don't blame David for wanting to comment on that. I was never particularly thrilled with the "blanks update" itself, I just meant it as the most-extreme case of repo-bloat. Whatever you might think about the "blanks update", it's clear that the freebsd project was not crushed by the bloat in the cvs repo. My thought is that a change is either good or it's bad. We would not and should not avoid any GoodUpdate (tm) due to "repo-bloat". -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05101220b87e3dcefe28>