Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 18:58:14 -0800 From: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: lstewart@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r294540 - in head: etc/mtree include share/man/man4 share/man/man9 sys/netinet Message-ID: <20160122025814.GM33895@strugglingcoder.info> In-Reply-To: <20160122025037.GS1444@FreeBSD.org> References: <201601220207.u0M27nCM071788@repo.freebsd.org> <20160122022402.GJ33895@strugglingcoder.info> <20160122023900.GR1444@FreeBSD.org> <20160122024310.GL33895@strugglingcoder.info> <20160122025037.GS1444@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--37nyS7qXrnu4wN2o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/21/16 at 06:50P, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 06:43:10PM -0800, hiren panchasara wrote: > h> > h> > Provide new socket option TCP_CCALGOOPT, which stands for TCP= congestion > h> > h> > control algorithm options. The argument is variable length a= nd is opaque > h> > h> > to TCP, forwarded directly to the algorithm's ctl_output meth= od. > h> > h> > =20 > h> > h> > Provide new includes directory netinet/cc, where algorithm sp= ecific > h> > h> > headers can be installed. > h> > h> > =20 > h> > h> > The new API doesn't yet have any in tree consumers. > h> > h> > =20 > h> > h> > The original code written by lstewart. > h> > h> > Reviewed by: rrs, emax > h> > h> > Sponsored by: Netflix > h> > h> > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D711 > h> > h>=20 > h> > h> Thanks Lawrence and Glebius for the patch. > h> > h>=20 > h> > h> I know original plan was to have this in earlier but is it possib= le to > h> > h> still get this in 10.3 or would it be too soon? > h> >=20 > h> > Do you have a module that is going to utilize it? > h>=20 > h> Not right now. But having this in 10.3 can be useful. I don't want to > h> push. I can always carry this patch around if I need in 10. >=20 > Yes, I'm quite reluctant to merge. First we need more modules using the A= PI, > and then we can say ourselves that API is good and can go into stable. Si= nce > when it wents into stable, we should no longer change it. Fair enough. Cheers, Hiren --37nyS7qXrnu4wN2o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAABCgBmBQJWoZrDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lzgEIAIucQ9LmCg2Xd7ornt+ft4mf L/tUQpJWd3Hwhu00dar1PDoRXABmahwfnbKWeyGRqLqOZBEOnR6dveRiPBxO1gxw /nwRIW1V/gt6RE0LXmZvb6PrVL8ITICyRV//JvPuy7N/Yp54+7adKzrKb5VQyVH+ izWd+LE0ZstXdTsNg2Y/KVpYx0jyb5InYW5FXNwaRzaDM1RCpepItaGMNBCzEyio TyMST6q1NcJz+49YembkxTDI+WES9L6ec+/nhYxPxxGa9cgYszt5EHgqToYOkrfj pvB3B3SCDHLBwFZnvaNWSwNOH9GcYegIv3JuBw2mgEZF8M1LNTsdhcwuvcOwkfU= =MJvE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --37nyS7qXrnu4wN2o--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160122025814.GM33895>