Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:38:50 -0600 From: "Randall R. Stewart (home)" <randall@stewart.chicago.il.us> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml.ventu@flashnet.it> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two ISP lines Message-ID: <40106D1A.3000902@stewart.chicago.il.us> In-Reply-To: <200401191533.i0JFXUDE050449@soth.ventu> References: <200401191533.i0JFXUDE050449@soth.ventu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrea/all: An interesting question... the following link has some thoughts along these lines... and something for the BSD community to think upon... http://www.sctp.org/what_is_alt_route TCP could definetly use something like the above (with Itojun's Multi-path updates as well).. it would give more reliability to even a singly homed protocol such as TCP :-> R Andrea Venturoli wrote: >Ok, I asked already asked something similar to this in the past, but it's not the same thing... maybe it's a trivial >question... >If I had two lines to the Internet: how would I use both? >Could I just provide two default routes? How? >What algorithm would be used to choose among the two? >What if one failed? > > bye & Thanks > av. > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- Randall R. Stewart 815-477-2127 (office) 815-342-5222 (cell phone)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40106D1A.3000902>