Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:30:24 +0200
From:      Herve Quiroz <herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr>
To:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc:        freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [SUGGEST] Reform eclipse and eclipse related ports
Message-ID:  <20051017153024.GA23494@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr>
In-Reply-To: <1B8112AF-8C0E-4BA0-8D1C-DA6AD529F327@softweyr.com>
References:  <200510150015.j9F0ExKr085847@sakura.ninth-nine.com> <E14F38B2-B1AF-415F-AE6B-A4BE6330A83D@opensail.org> <20051015053003.GB28137@soaustin.net> <4350CE50.8080704@ebs.gr> <5739E97B-7EDC-4971-9EA5-01A44688A981@softweyr.com> <43522953.6050700@ebs.gr> <1B8112AF-8C0E-4BA0-8D1C-DA6AD529F327@softweyr.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[recipient list trimmed down]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 06:55:25PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> That's exactly the point I was (and am) trying to argue against.  I  
> have to resort to 'make search' to find emacs tools these days  
> because they've been thrown all over the ports system by well-meaning  
> but misguided contributors, and I'd hate to see that happen to  
> eclipse tools too.

Greg (glewis@) already suggested to create a new *virtual* category for
Eclipse ports to ease the search of a port. That could do the trick...

Or else you may just use FreshPorts.org facilities to look for an
Eclipse plugin:

http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=name&method=match&query=eclipse&num=100&orderby=category&orderbyupdown=asc&search=Search

Again, I don't think we should make an exception of Eclipse. All other
ports comply to the convention and for instance there is no 'apache'
non-virtual category. Regarding Apache, we are speaking of at least 116
'mod_*' ports while there are only 24 eclipse ports. Moreover, 'apache'
is not even a virtual category. But that's probably because all 'mod_*'
ports are in the same 'www' non-virtual category.

So my take is that either we group all Eclipse ports into the same
non-virtual category (but not a new 'eclipse' category which makes no
sense) or we scater them but tag them by having them all in the
'eclipse' virtual category.

Herve


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051017153024.GA23494>