Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:22:00 -0700
From:      bmah@FreeBSD.ORG (Bruce A. Mah)
To:        Mark Blackman <mark.blackman@netscalibur.co.uk>
Cc:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, nik@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: RELNOTESng now default in 4-STABLE, *.TXT files removed 
Message-ID:  <200106081522.f58FM0X95763@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010608085559.A67099@admin4.dircon.net> 
References:  <200106061634.f56GYlA90861@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010606095724R.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <200106062201.f56M1Wd70662@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010606162900G.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010608085559.A67099@admin4.dircon.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
If memory serves me right, Mark Blackman wrote:
> Strictly speaking, we do have latex as a separate port which doesn't
> pull in the quite the monstrosities that teTex requires.
> 
> In principle, one could either modify the existing jadetex port
> to optionally or exclusively require only latex. I presume jadetex
> doesn't fundamentally require much beyond pdf(la)tex (which is in latex).
> 
> Latex is pretty big but not quite unthinkably so.
> 
> If this functionality (PDF on release) is considered quite nice
> and nobody else wants to jump on it, I might have a go at converting
> the jadetex port with the assistance of the current maintainer.

Well...jkh and I both like the idea.  

I'm not sure what (if any) other issues there are, since I'm pretty
ignorant of the differences between the latex and teTeX ports.

Another thought:  I was just wondering if there might be a way to
disable the xdvi build/install in the teTeX build, so we could just
check for NO_X when building teTeX (the release building process already
defines NO_X, principally for use by print/ghostscript6).  I noticed a
whole lot of configure options getting passed as a part of teTeX's
build, but I haven't really investigated.

Thanks!

Bruce.



[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001

iD8DBQE7IO2X2MoxcVugUsMRAldLAKCE15YxBAT/Pd/a0fdhbSBg99jRkQCg1s8A
aBGRTGw1IACkdD5J9LRu2x4=
=axw+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106081522.f58FM0X95763>