Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 21:46:27 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 271474] Possible to "lose" a tap(4) interface in a jail Message-ID: <bug-271474-7501-7KFIG6bhQb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-271474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-271474-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D271474 --- Comment #4 from Joshua Kinard <freebsd@kumba.dev> --- (In reply to matthias+freebsd+bugzilla from comment #3) I started and stopped the jail multiple times using the normal commands and= it destroyed tap0 and recreated tap0 each time as long as I had the VM fully destroyed. Could be a race-like condition and so not easily triggerable. I may try again later tonight or tomorrow to see if I can re-create it, and m= ay also re-try on my production appliance. FWIW, I use cloned_interfaces to create the bridge interface, too, but I ha= ve learned to list bridge interfaces last in that variable after all member interfaces have been created, and that does seem to avoid some issues that I saw on one of my other appliances. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-271474-7501-7KFIG6bhQb>