Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 20:34:54 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bad rtwn(0) performance with RTL8188CE on -CURRENT after r302035 Message-ID: <20160627183454.GD28353@athena.sysfault.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=FMEEc=T094k6sW4WW3KnjCL6OSarvT=QA2e38XofX_Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <20160627170619.GB28353@athena.sysfault.org> <bacdd981-d5a6-18c9-af35-55912237bd60@bsd.com.br> <CAJ-Vmo=FMEEc=T094k6sW4WW3KnjCL6OSarvT=QA2e38XofX_Q@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On, Mon Jun 27, 2016, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Heh, there isn't any 11n support in rtwn (and won't be until I unify > rtwn and urtwn post-11.) I do not know about that. My experience from pre-r302035 were 1-2 Mbit/s downstream from some servers, but often enough just for a minute or two before everything stopped working. > > I'll go find the rtwn NIC and see if I can figure out what's going on. Let me know, if and how I can assist with it. Cheers Marcus [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAldxccEACgkQi68/ErJnpkd8DQCgjehgi7tnM4Gvpdk5f3jaLRij x+YAoIZXQskUKJoWXgRVYmGng5co9oyW =LqTu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160627183454.GD28353>