Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 14:18:19 +0200 From: Marc "UBM" Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1 Message-ID: <20041009141819.52fc0a7b.ubm@u-boot-man.de> In-Reply-To: <20041008031737.GA1027@green.homeunix.org> References: <20041006090104.06710d85.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006154137.GJ47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041006203220.7f8e7b8a.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041006192518.GM47017@green.homeunix.org> <cd70c681041006125527e69bcd@mail.gmail.com> <20041006215134.GN47017@green.homeunix.org> <20041007010008.15274fbd.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <20041007181852.GA73261@green.homeunix.org> <cd70c681041007121113048277@mail.gmail.com> <20041007191757.GB73261@green.homeunix.org> <20041008031737.GA1027@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 23:17:38 -0400 Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:17:57PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 03:11:48PM -0400, Vlad wrote: > > > Brian, > > > > > > thanks for your work. Question: is this patch is something I can > > > feel comfortable about trying it on a production server? Did you > > > test it? > > > > It is completely untested other than compilation. I don't have my > > SMP machine with console in front of me to be able to try to > > reproduce the problem, but I believe these changes to be relatively > > safe. > > Okay, now I do; I did a more thorough potential fix -- so if that > worked for you, this should do the same without a socket memory leak. > The life and times of sockets are fraught with peril... > > <URL:http://green.homeunix.org/~green/tcp_accept_race_crash.patch>; Ok, I'm running 2 days+ now with the first version of your patch, no crashes so far. Looks like you fixed it :-) Bye Marc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041009141819.52fc0a7b.ubm>