Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:03:37 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/10131: bug in strptime(3) Message-ID: <21432.930060217@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Jun 1999 15:32:32 %2B0200." <98756.930058352@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <98756.930058352@axl.noc.iafrica.com>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > >On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:25:59 -0400, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > >> The only advantage to a uuencoded patch (as opposed to gziped and then >> uuencoded) is that it prevents people from destroying tabs with stupid >> cut and paste errors. > >Hey, you're preaching to the converted. I _prefer_ uuencoded patches >(even shars and tarballs), since I just query-pr -F XXXX | uudecode. :-) I don't prefer them uuencoded, it makes it harder to read the substance of the changes -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21432.930060217>