Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:37:16 +0000 From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@qxnitro.org> To: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: explicit use of /etc/rc.d vs service Message-ID: <CAC8HS2Ewh391gbCQb2QFm8k3-uUUKp=5bibrmy4RAnNj93V1Ew@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnJPFevO7W%2BypBZdcL7deB%2B_cQHF0AEcVaWWv8FFhcNcQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Jan 2013 15:54, "Eitan Adler" <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: > > Would anyone object to a patch which converts uses of > "/etc/rc.d/daemon start" to "service daemon start" and the like? > I would like to see service(1) become the standard interface to using services. Sounds like a very good idea. I don't know how many times I have had problems with bad paths leaking into cron etc meaning it fails on reboot since something depended on the trained environment. (Service solves that.) Simon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAC8HS2Ewh391gbCQb2QFm8k3-uUUKp=5bibrmy4RAnNj93V1Ew>