Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2000 12:07:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To:        Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>
Cc:        Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com>, Thomas Stromberg <tstromberg@rtci.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: No /boot/loader (dangerously dedicated)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241207020.90317-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007230015100.20802-100000@snafu.adept.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Mike Hoskins wrote:

> > So you'll be compatible with your BIOS as well.  Many BIOSen get really,
> > really torqued if your partition table isn't normal.
> > 
> > It's a negligible amount of space.  Just say 'Yes'. :)
> 
> This means, what?  All dangerously dedicated systems will have to be
> reinstalled or somesuch?  If so, that's quite a mess.  If it keeps working
> as is, but only suggests the new way is better...  that's livable.
> 
> My BIOSes (6 systems here at home, all RELENG_4) work just fine with
> dangerously dedicated...

Well, my BIOSen get mad, and we have Intel L440GX+ boards.  The onboard
Adaptec really gets mad if ALL of the disks aren't sliced -- it crashes
boot2!

Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu     |  www.FreeBSD.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241207020.90317-100000>