Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:44:12 +0400 From: "Alexey Karagodov" <karagodov@gmail.com> To: "Alex Povolotsky" <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: 6.2-RELEASE does not use second CPU? Message-ID: <c7aff4ef0704250344j560c07c5n38444abe2b1932ef@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <462F26A8.5090500@webmail.sub.ru> References: <c7aff4ef0704201154u52bb054cs6f93067fbaa37a21@mail.gmail.com> <20070420190857.9A34445058@ptavv.es.net> <20070420191105.GA38067@xor.obsecurity.org> <462F26A8.5090500@webmail.sub.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
please, dmesg, mptable -verbose, mptable -grope 2007/4/25, Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>: > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:08:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > >>> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:54:52 +0400 > >>> From: "Alexey Karagodov" <karagodov@gmail.com> > >>> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > >>> > >>> and what is this, i mean why: > >>> WARNING: debug.mpsafenet forced to 0 as ipsec requires Giant > >>> WARNING: MPSAFE network stack disabled, expect reduced performance. > >>> > >> I thought it was pretty clear. > >> > >> ipsec is not multi-processor safe and requires the use of GIANT. If you > >> have IPSEC in your kernel the network stack will also be giant locked > >> which will cut performance. > >> > > > > Yep, google for extensive discussion (hint: FAST_IPSEC) > > > > No visible changes in behaviour with FAST_IPSEC > > Fast IPsec: Initialized Security Association Processing. > > mptable still shows ONE CPU > > Alex. > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c7aff4ef0704250344j560c07c5n38444abe2b1932ef>