Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 08:55:32 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, doc-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-doc@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en index.xsl Message-ID: <4464AFF4.8030506@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060512130211.GA89089@submonkey.net> References: <200605120254.k4C2s3BS052028@repoman.freebsd.org> <4464020F.3000609@freebsd.org> <446403FE.8050908@freebsd.org> <20060512130211.GA89089@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1E1D699250D1BE84AB264D48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 05:41:50AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: >> Bruce A. Mah wrote: >>> If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>>> andre 2006-05-12 02:54:03 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD doc repository (src committer) >>>> >>>> Modified files: >>>> en index.xsl=20 >>>> Log: >>>> Alpha has left the building. Add ARM and rearrange the list of=20 >>>> architectures >>>> a bit. >>> I wonder if the !alpha part was a little premature? Yes, the alpha >>> kernel bits are gone from HEAD, but they're still around on RELENG_5 = and >>> RELENG_6, and we're still planning to do releases from both of those >>> codelines. The first release that won't include alpha will be 7.0, a= nd >>> its release cycle doesn't even *start* for over a year. >>> >>> Just a thought... >> There are like two remaining Alpha users and we most likely won't gain= >> any new ones in the foreseeable future. Though we are compiling releas= es >> according to jhb it isn't even clear they actually work on Alpha. It'= s >> not actively maintained anymore. It really has left the building and = there >> is no point in advertising it on our homepage instead of on some rando= m >> tombstone somewhere out in the past architectures graveyard. >=20 > That's as may be, but you really should have gotten approval from a doc= > committer for this commit. Bruce is one, he disagrees, you should back= > it out. Just for the record, I didn't even notice what set of commit bits andre has, and I would have sent exactly the same comment even if he was a member of doceng@ or core@. :-) It's also true that the sun is still going to come up tomorrow no matter what winds up on the homepage, so I'd like people not to get *too* worked up over this, regardless of how they feel. Peace, Bruce. --------------enig1E1D699250D1BE84AB264D48 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEZK/52MoxcVugUsMRAhIpAJ4/1OD7YQTZ+VpTHUtcT7J/MYrMLwCggO6x YkEk21fVjat6OtqUAVhdJoE= =l+u8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1E1D699250D1BE84AB264D48--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4464AFF4.8030506>