Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:45:52 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: IPSec + 5.2.current Problem Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <200408080622.i786Mnhe017474@www1.pochta.ru> <20040808132524.GB1033@mehnert.org><20040809112700.GB659@mehnert.org> <20040809150754.13ca108a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091314260.1709@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040809153341.24963cfd@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC) > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > > > I also had some problems with IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP, changing require > > > > to use in the policies fixed that. With require racoon was not able > > > > to initiate phase 1, because all non esp traffic was dropped. > > > > whyever I hadn't seen this posting. > > Did you noticed Message-Id: > <20040805223027.7df0732b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> on -current? I had seen that mail but I cannot see this paragraph in there. anyway.. > > > > I think this is a datapoint... I use a "require" policy too. ATM I can't > > > test with "use" instead. > > > > but this problem had been fixed months ago for IPSEC. > > Any other idea for the cause of the observed behavior? which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD. your problem: do you really need gif(4) ? if yes - what for ? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0408091338520.1709>