Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 17 Mar 1999 15:05:48 -0600 (CST)
From:      "Jasper O'Malley" <jooji@webnology.com>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Mark Ovens <marko@uk.radan.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Intel PIII "Anti Piracy Feature"?
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.02.9903171450120.24999-100000@mercury.webnology.com>
In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990317123427.03e49280@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Brett Glass wrote:

> Didn't they began cutting 16-bit slices out of the bigger 24-bit ones
> to accommodate manufacturers with lower production volumes (and to
> avoid running out of address space as the Internet is)?

I hadn't heard that, but that would still mean 40-bit OUIs rather than
16-bit OUIs (a 16-bit OUI is  "bigger" than a 24-bit OUI, in terms of 
address space).

Cheers,
Mick

The Reverend Jasper P. O'Malley          dotdot:jooji@webnology.com
    Systems Administrator                  ringring:asktheadmiral
	Webnology, LLC               woowoo:http://www.webnology.com/~jooji



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.02.9903171450120.24999-100000>