Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 00:03:26 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>, James <james@hicag.org>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Possible Clang regression - object files are always mode 0600 Message-ID: <4FC547AE.9060606@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4FC50065.3030201@andric.com> References: <CAD4099=POFm_bpBGjLXozFF9MX1SrAc-UCR8SwRnh7LVf=FdoQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120529162701.GZ1509@albert.catwhisker.org> <4FC50065.3030201@andric.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-05-29 18:59, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-29 18:27, David Wolfskill wrote: >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:39:19AM -0500, James wrote: >>> Hi all. I've come across a possible Clang regression that recently >>> crept into stable/9. I'd like to check to see whether it's a true bug >>> or if I jacked something up. It appears all object files are created >>> with mode 0600 rather than honoring umask. > Just so you know, this is indeed a regression that has crept into clang, > and even into the 3.1 release. :( > > I'm working on fixing it in head, then I will merge the fix to stable/9 > in a few days. Fixed in head in r236260; the merge will follow soon.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC547AE.9060606>