Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:24:34 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net> Cc: karsten@rohrbach.de, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ** HEADS UP ** portmap daemon renamed to rpcbind Message-ID: <200103281424.f2SEOYh47811@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <3AC18E42.DED4D2A5@DougBarton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
>
> > the idea is, that if rpcbind takes parameters different from portmap it
> > would make sense to call rpcbind rpcbind because people's boxes will
> > start to barf when rpcbind is called portmap, they make world, and skip
> > reading the rpcbind paragraph in UPDATING ;-)
> >
> > does this make sense?
>
> Yes. "Takes parameters different from portmap," makes much more sense than
> "takes parameters." :)
FYI:
SYNOPSIS
portmap [-d] [-v]
SYNOPSIS
rpcbind [-dilLs]
Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103281424.f2SEOYh47811>