Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 16:38:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@mat.net> To: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Cc: andy@cgu.chel.su, asami@FreeBSD.org, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909191636590.3586-100000@picnic.mat.net> In-Reply-To: <19990920033633G.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, R. Imura wrote:
> > And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
> > ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff?
> > I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
> > What your opinions?
>
> I think so, too.
But you guys seem never to have looked at the code. With the setup we
have now, any port that uses imake to build itself must install itself
under the x11 tree, and you don't get an option on that.
> But, for example in the KDE's case, It have been difficult to install
> ${X11BASE} for me. I think it is better KDE installed to ${X11BASE}.
> Now I'm testing to do so by using idea of PR #13800. It may be possible.
> Does this trial have any problem?
>
> I'll change qt201/qt-i18n tomorrow.
>
> Thanks.
> ---
> R. Imura
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chuck Robey | Interests include C programming, Electronics,
213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1 | communications, and signal processing.
Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and
(301) 220-2114 | jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909191636590.3586-100000>