Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 10:05:27 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus Makefile Message-ID: <20020408070527.GB45269@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20020407235357.A65399@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200204040050.g340oEK35800@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020407162550.GE67968@sunbay.com> <20020407235357.A65399@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:53:57PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:25:50PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 04:50:14PM -0800, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > > obrien 2002/04/03 16:50:14 PST
> > >=20
> > > Modified files:
> > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1 Makefile=20
> > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1obj Makefile=20
> > > gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc1plus Makefile=20
> > > Log:
> > > Set NOSHARED conditionally.
> > > =20
> > Why? Conditionally setting NOSHARED only makes sense in Makefile.inc
> > where it may be overridden by individual makefiles beneath it.
> > (Seeing if Bruce agrees.)
>=20
> Do you and BDE now search out every one of my commits with a goal of
> turning it into a bike shed?
>=20
> Why? Because some people have a [misguided] hatred for static binaries.
> They want to be able to have their compiler be a shared binary. They can
> achieve this with "NOSHARED=3Dno".
>=20
> /usr/share/mk/bsd.prog.mk:.if defined(NOSHARED) && ( ${NOSHARED} !=3D "no=
" && ${NOSHARED} !=3D "NO" )
>=20
> Notice that the value of NOSHARED is actually checked besides just its
> existence. But I am tried of the debate on this commit from both you and
> BDE (this is the 5th message about it). So I will just say "fuck it" and
> put "NOSHARED=3Dyes" in gnu/usr.bin/cc/Makefile.inc and have a totally
> static compiler suite that cannot easily be changed.
>=20
This only shows your inability to properly communicate with others. I just
wondered about this particular change because you did not provide any good
reason for it in your commit log (the place where this stuff should probably
go in the first place).
I now know the answer (modulo the s/f.ck/heck/), thank you very much.
I also expect that you apologize for such inappropriate behavior.
Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA,
ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine
http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age
--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8sUE3Ukv4P6juNwoRAnpGAJ9NvaJkPNUTNd1K9jRU20P+KQ17FwCfdz3G
aWlOxzAZvlinQS3FZ6IRl1s=
=e8CG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oC1+HKm2/end4ao3--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020408070527.GB45269>