Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Nov 2000 14:46:04 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The shared /bin and /sbin bikeshed
Message-ID:  <20001111144604.B21664@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200011111854.LAA04008@nomad.yogotech.com>; from nate@yogotech.com on Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:54:58AM -0700
References:  <200011110257.eAB2vj034258@vashon.polstra.com> <200011110315.eAB3Fp909237@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200011111854.LAA04008@nomad.yogotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 11, 2000 at 11:54:58AM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> For awhile, GCC's internal compiler libraries were compiled shared, but
> the speedups from compiling them static were significant enough to show
> static linking is *significantly* faster than shared linking, even if
> you remove the startup issues.

Hate to say this, but GCC 3.0 will most likely use a shared libgcc.

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
          GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001111144604.B21664>