Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:30:08 +0000
From:      Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Cc:        doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: elderly anchors
Message-ID:  <20011212213008.B11856@clan.nothing-going-on.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011212123254.A45773@blackhelicopters.org>; from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org on Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:32:54PM -0500
References:  <20011212123254.A45773@blackhelicopters.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 12:32:54PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote:
> At one point, we used anchor to point to particular sections in the
> FAQ.  Then some selfless non-committer put in a couple of PRs to add
> question id= tags to each and every question in the blasted thing.
> 
> In quite a few (not all!) cases, it appears that the anchor tags are
> moot with that addition.
> 
>       <qandaentry>
>         <question id="dangerously-dedicated">
>           <para>Will a <quote>dangerously dedicated</quote> disk endanger
>             my health?</para>
>         </question>
> 
>         <answer>
> 
>           <para><anchor id="dedicate">T
> 
> Am I missing something, or should such tags go away?

They can go away (as long as nothing links to them).

N
-- 
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve             http://www.freebsd.org/
FreeBSD Documentation Project           http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/

          --- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F  94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjwXzF8ACgkQk6gHZCw343WwJACfUbLXKEEhEexxYCD565IkrUao
dYsAn0xx/18gNUyIT2DCMila0r1eNzVg
=MIWO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011212213008.B11856>