Date: 23 Jul 2001 05:06:00 +0200 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@FreeBSD.org> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil ecalloc.c emalloc.3 emalloc.c erealloc.c estrdup.c Makefile libutil.h Message-ID: <5lwv508huv.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: Wes Peters's message of "Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:57:50 -0600" References: <3698025593.995835470@blabber>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> writes: > I'd rather see such a library in a port/package. Sure, the emalloc > etc., might help clarify applications, but like Brian I'm not convinced > they need to be in our standard library. But this function (emalloc) is used and included in lots of the programs in the tree. Since you're not likely suggesting we make them dependent of a port/package, should we keep copies of this function everywhere or should we just inline it? /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5lwv508huv.fsf>