Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Aug 2014 16:12:14 -0400
From:      Daniel Staal <DStaal@usa.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: some ZFS questions
Message-ID:  <0C5CEDB044E788B85C2E0A0D@[192.168.1.50]>
In-Reply-To: <20140825182440.GA57059@slackbox.erewhon.home>
References:  <201408070816.s778G9ug015988@sdf.org> <40AF5B49-80AF-4FE2-BA14-BFF86164EAA8@kraus-haus.org> <201408211007.s7LA7YGd002430@sdf.org> <20140822005911.GA52625@neutralgood.org> <201408241027.s7OARfEK004658@sdf.org> <53FB0AFD.6010507@cyberleo.net> <20140825182440.GA57059@slackbox.erewhon.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--As of August 25, 2014 8:24:40 PM +0200, Roland Smith is alleged to have=20
said:

> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 05:07:57AM -0500, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote:
>> On 08/24/2014 05:27 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> > kpneal@pobox.com wrote:
>> >> What's the harm in encrypting all the data?
>> >
>> > High CPU overhead for both reading and writing is the main downside.
>>
>> AES-NI is fully supported for recent Intel CPUs, and can achieve some
>> pretty impressive throughputs.
>>
>> >>
>> >> In fact, encrypting all data is more secure. If you only encrypt the
>> >> data
>> >
>> > Sure, but why do it if the data don't need to be secret?
>>
>> Because it takes 6-8 hours to erase a 3TB hard disk; and, if the disk
>> fails, you can't always erase it before sending it back for RMA
>> replacement.
>
> Are you following some kind of complex protocol? With a bog-standard 7.5k
> SATA drive on an Intel ICH9M controller I've measured write speeds (using
> =E2=80=9Cdd if=3D/dev/zero=E2=80=9D) of 85500000 bytes/s. That would mean =
approximately
> 3.25 hours to wipe 3TB by filling it with zeroes.

--As for the rest, it is mine.

If he's in some sort of corporate environment there's probably a rule to=20
use two-pass erasure or something, based on the AFSSI-5020 (or similar)=20
standard.  They don't care about probably: There's some lawyer or someone=20
who wants to be *sure*, and found that rule that says that is sure.  ;)  If =

single-pass takes 3.25, two pass would be around 6.5 hours, right in the=20
middle of that time range.

At the very least, they'll have some rule on 'this at least must be done',=20
and even 3.25 hours is a lot more than 'oh, it's all encrypted, so we don't =

have to wipe it'.

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0C5CEDB044E788B85C2E0A0D>