Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 13:57:47 +0300 From: "Vladimir B. Grebenschikov" <vova@fbsd.ru> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: MAJOR changes to the ports system Message-ID: <1075892266.779.33.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1075883492.76993.65.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402040021500.71519-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <1075883492.76993.65.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 =D3=D2, 04.02.2004, =D7 11:31, Joe Marcus Clarke =D0=C9=DB=C5=D4: > On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 03:22, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >=20 > > > Sorry for the wide distribution, but it is critical that -CURRENT use= rs > > > hear this. Two _MAJOR_ changes just went in to the ports tree that a= re > > > bound to cause some pain to -CURRENT users. =20 > > >=20 > >=20 > > I'm glad to hear about this and I wouldn't mind hearing regularly about > > major events over in the ports tree. >=20 > I've started doing this. The full summary was sent to ports@ and > ports-developers@, plus I added a copy to /usr/ports/CHANGES. This is > now the second major ports update I've summarized. Once the archives > get back up to speed, you should be able to see my previous summary. How about gettext -> gettext-old transition ? A lot of ports still=20 depends on gettext-old while others on gettext, gettext conflicts with=20 gettext-old, and, as result, portupgrade -af constatntly tries to install gettext-old as dependancy and fails. > Joe --=20 Vladimir B. Grebenschikov <vova@fbsd.ru> SWsoft Inc.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1075892266.779.33.camel>