Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:07:17 GMT From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat Message-ID: <201212121007.qBCA7Hu9028406@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the
standard procedure. I then get:
# make check-old-libs
>>> Checking for old libraries
/lib/libz.so.5
#
while sysutils/libchk shows:
Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5
/usr/sbin/dtrace
/usr/sbin/lockstat
and indeed these two executables depend
on this library:
# ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace
/usr/sbin/dtrace:
libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000)
# ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat
/usr/sbin/lockstat:
libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000)
libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000)
#
I see that these two executables are old:
# ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 58976 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 72832 Jul 18 2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat
#
Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat
are obsolete and can be removed?
Thanks
Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201212121007.qBCA7Hu9028406>