Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Message-ID: <200305251800.h4PI0PNZ079185@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR i386/41930; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 18:55:40 +0100
Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR i386/52458:
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:57:08 +1000
From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Message-Id: <20030520075708.GK605@k7.mavetju>
References: <200208230950.g7N9oXDs000777@terrorfish.uni.stoert.net> <20030520074754.GA95715@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:47:54AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > >Description:
> > when including both <string.h> and <machine/cpufunc.h> from a C++
> > source, gcc yields a declaration error:
> >
> > From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
> > I ran into the same problem today with ports/audio/mpmf20.
> > machine/cpufunc.h does set a flag if it has has been processed:
> > HAVE_INLINE_FFS (line 106 of /usr/include/machine/cpufunc.h).
> >
> > So strings.h could be modified [...]
>
> I've just been bit by another instance of this (hpoj-printer driver
> port). Are there any intentions to fix this RSN? Is there somebody
> specific who could be contacted about this issue?
> I'm cc:ing mike@ who last touched strings.h.
I've asked tjr@ to do something with it but he didn't come further
than "well if you swap the two functions you have the same problem
again"...
Edwin
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305251800.h4PI0PNZ079185>