Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Message-ID: <200305251800.h4PI0PNZ079185@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR i386/41930; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: i386/41930: declaration clash for ffs() and ${CXX}
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 18:55:40 +0100
Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR i386/52458:
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:57:08 +1000
From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
Message-Id: <20030520075708.GK605@k7.mavetju>
References: <200208230950.g7N9oXDs000777@terrorfish.uni.stoert.net> <20030520074754.GA95715@i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 09:47:54AM +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> > >Description:
> > when including both <string.h> and <machine/cpufunc.h> from a C++
> > source, gcc yields a declaration error:
> >
> > From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>
> > I ran into the same problem today with ports/audio/mpmf20.
> > machine/cpufunc.h does set a flag if it has has been processed:
> > HAVE_INLINE_FFS (line 106 of /usr/include/machine/cpufunc.h).
> >
> > So strings.h could be modified [...]
>
> I've just been bit by another instance of this (hpoj-printer driver
> port). Are there any intentions to fix this RSN? Is there somebody
> specific who could be contacted about this issue?
> I'm cc:ing mike@ who last touched strings.h.
I've asked tjr@ to do something with it but he didn't come further
than "well if you swap the two functions you have the same problem
again"...
Edwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200305251800.h4PI0PNZ079185>