Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:23:43 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: riscv@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 256618] databases/mariadb10[345]-server: patch and unbreak on riscv64 Message-ID: <bug-256618-40250-P6SII29qiZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-256618-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-256618-40250@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D256618 Mitchell Horne <mhorne@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mhorne@freebsd.org --- Comment #6 from Mitchell Horne <mhorne@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to Robert Clausecker from comment #4) Hi, I'm happy to provide a patch for the base system to define the missing valu= es on riscv. However, it is worth noting that the reason we have not done so t= hus far is because the unstandardized ieeefp.h has long been deprecated in favo= r of fenv.h, which is part of the C99 standard. It seems the better fix would be to remove this outdated and FreeBSD-specif= ic code block from MariaDB, and make use of the fenv(3) functions like other platforms do. It looks like there are existing feature flags for this, HAVE_FEDISABLEEXCEPT, and HAVE_FESETROUND. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-256618-40250-P6SII29qiZ>