Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:38:18 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patch for IPSEC_NAT_T Message-ID: <20061014153818.GA94704@jayce.zen.inc> In-Reply-To: <20061013165518.103236c8@loki.starkstrom.lan> References: <25685948.1160744185756.JavaMail.root@web03sl> <20061013130256.GA10192@zen.inc> <ff64092b0610130727y3417027dr501c29677fa10ee2@mail.gmail.com> <20061013143201.GA21926@zen.inc> <20061013165518.103236c8@loki.starkstrom.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200 > VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> wrote: > > > I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC > > / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn' > > define IPSEC_NAT_T. > > Or it won't compile because some defines are missing, just like umass > breaks without scbus. Maybe. But as quite all NAT-T code is inside IPSEC/FAST_IPSEC, it may also just compile cleanly. Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061014153818.GA94704>