Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:09:54 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Markus Brueffer <markus@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   symlinks in mtree (Re: cvs commit: ports/net/dcgui Makefile distinfo ports/net/dcgui/files patch-main.cpp)
Message-ID:  <20040227220954.GA26579@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1077919699.39459.9.camel@hood.oook.cz>
References:  <200402271506.i1RF6EPV053698@green.homeunix.org> <1077894594.9195.25.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040227205550.GA24693@xor.obsecurity.org> <1077915957.39459.7.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20040227215021.GA25978@xor.obsecurity.org> <1077919699.39459.9.camel@hood.oook.cz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:08:20PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:

> > > > These are symlinks and cannot be listed in mtree files.  That's why
> > > > they're created by bsd.port.mk instead.
> > > 
> > > And now the good news - symlinks can be listed in and created from mtree
> > > files. I have a patch for BSD.local.mtree ready waiting for green to
> > > approve it.
> > 
> > Why does this apparently work now but not a few months ago when
> > ports/53189 was submitted?  I have the feeling something is missing here.
> 
> No idea, according to cvs log mtree handles symlink for years now.
> Maybe ache@ just haven't tried to add it to mtree back then?

We should wait to hear from him for clarification.

Kris

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAP8AyWry0BWjoQKURAupWAJ9QvWmbF+wCKYn9aai0KjE68ZaauQCgjnfz
9T6Budr7VWmYWgC7ti4K8+I=
=UViw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040227220954.GA26579>