Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:29:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 223849] math/py-pandas: Update to 0.21.0 Message-ID: <bug-223849-21822-8FBIFwRs4m@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-223849-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-223849-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223849 --- Comment #7 from John W. O'Brien <john@saltant.com> --- That's a relatively recent change [0] and I can find no traffic at all on the ports list or ports-announce describing it, let alone asking for existing ports to be changed. What's the benefit of changing? What problem does it solve? Is it a problem with this port that I'm not aware of? Can a larger problem only be solved if this port changes? It seems like it creates needless churn, which frustrates me. Furthermore, without sufficient reason, nor the coordinated effort required to convert tens of thousands of ports to the newly preferred style, it also seems likely to fizzle out and leave the tree in a more inconsistent state than when we started, which frustrates me more. I can appreciate your disinclination to revert the change. Nevertheless, it leaves a bad taste in my mouth. [0] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/doc/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/chapter.xml?r1=50627&r2=50628&; -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-223849-21822-8FBIFwRs4m>