Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:38:24 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Matt Juszczak <matt@atopia.net>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: [SPAM] Re: 5.3-STABLE
Message-ID:  <20041018043824.GA19694@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041017231901.C13125@neptune.atopia.net>
References:  <20041017165815.GE98300@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20041017171142.GC37640@werd> <03FF0AEE-20AB-11D9-B097-000A95BE58A4@tf7.so-net.ne.jp> <20041018021440.GC86036@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041017231901.C13125@neptune.atopia.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:19:31PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote:
> Is it bad for a production server to maintain 5.3 stable vs. release?

See the handbook for discussion of this issue.

Kris

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBc0jAWry0BWjoQKURAlsTAKDLoj25OihGUmMsIFOX8PmqM6SZMQCgoPrS
zNPnOAplbs5MHDFuzGwVhTQ=
=9Irb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018043824.GA19694>