Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 21:38:24 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matt Juszczak <matt@atopia.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: 5.3-STABLE Message-ID: <20041018043824.GA19694@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041017231901.C13125@neptune.atopia.net> References: <20041017165815.GE98300@millerlite.local.mark-and-erika.com> <20041017171142.GC37640@werd> <03FF0AEE-20AB-11D9-B097-000A95BE58A4@tf7.so-net.ne.jp> <20041018021440.GC86036@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041017231901.C13125@neptune.atopia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:19:31PM -0400, Matt Juszczak wrote: > Is it bad for a production server to maintain 5.3 stable vs. release? See the handbook for discussion of this issue. Kris --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBc0jAWry0BWjoQKURAlsTAKDLoj25OihGUmMsIFOX8PmqM6SZMQCgoPrS zNPnOAplbs5MHDFuzGwVhTQ= =9Irb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041018043824.GA19694>