Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:29:03 -0800 From: matt <sendtomatt@gmail.com> To: Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch> Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPC DRM graphics testing Message-ID: <5098CA4F.7020306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch> References: <50972E9E.3010101@gmail.com> <50974ECD.5010702@fgznet.ch> <50988FE0.9030806@gmail.com> <50989EA0.5020509@fgznet.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/05/12 21:22, Andreas Tobler wrote: > Hm, I can try to bring the Radeon 9200 PCI up and see how it behaves. > It'll take a few moments. But at least we have another config to compare. > > Oh, and one thing to note, my config works with built-in (not a kernel > module) drm/radeondrm. Have you tried this too? > > Kernel config: > # Direct Rendering modules for 3D acceleration. > device drm # DRM core module required by DRM drivers > device radeondrm # ATI Radeon > > > Attached the patch to make it compile. > > Andreas > > > A good idea, but it didn't help. Backtrace was slightly different, but nothing decisive. exaCopyDirty() seems to be involved quite often. I also found 7.7 will not work, because although they left in r200, they stripped out UMS. So it's back to the drawing board, or at least poking at sources and/or gdb for a while :) Thanks Andreas Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5098CA4F.7020306>