Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 19:47:43 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam <sziszi@bsd.hu> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k3b causing system freeze/panic Message-ID: <20100728174743.GB1856@baranyfelhocske.buza.adamsfamily.xx> In-Reply-To: <86tynjltnd.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <4C4F9D75.50500@protected-networks.net> <4C4FE9E3.8090501@icyb.net.ua> <867hkfncod.fsf@ds4.des.no> <86tynjltnd.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 01:42:30PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Sorry, I misparsed ATA_CAM as ahci. Why on earth would anyone want to > use ATA_CAM these days? Well, I am not sure if you really meant ATA_CAM and not ATAPICAM? But in case you meant it, for people who do not use SATA-capable hardware, ATA_CAM is useful. This laptop may be no longer be the most recent model these days, but runs -CURRENT just fine most of the time. Also, if I remember correctly, for people with a bit more recent controllers ATA_CAM offers other advantages, but those do not affect me. So, for me ATA_CAM is just a better version of the ata(4) driver... -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100728174743.GB1856>