Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:47:42 -0700 From: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com> To: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.2-RELEASE '875 SCSI won't negotiage Message-ID: <199710212347.QAA09208@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> In-Reply-To: Stefan Esser <se@FreeBSD.ORG> "Re: 2.2.2-RELEASE '875 SCSI won't negotiage" (Oct 22, 12:13am)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Oct 22, 12:13am, Stefan Esser wrote: } Subject: Re: 2.2.2-RELEASE '875 SCSI won't negotiage } On 1997-10-21 08:17 +0200, J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> wrote: } > As dkelly@hiwaay.net wrote: } > } > > > sd0(ncr0:0:0): WIDE SCSI (16 bit) enabled } > > > sd0(ncr0:0:0): 20.0 MB/s (100 ns, offset 16) } > Probably should not. It should read as ``20 MHz'', this makes no } > promises about the actual speed. } } Yes, I've been thinking so for quite some time, to. } But I changed the message to report MB/s, anyway, on } popular demand :) } } If 40MB/s is reported, you still won't be able to get } more than some 37MB/s moved, actually, but well, it is } the number claimed by the drive and controller vendors, } and so it can't be wrong to report it :) But isn't this misleading if it's only connected to narrow devices?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710212347.QAA09208>