Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:51:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/20861: libc_r does not honor socket timeouts Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604181751050.26624@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20060419014445.I73773@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <200604182133.k3ILXmZp085715@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604181742170.26624@sea.ntplx.net> <20060419014445.I73773@mp2.macomnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 17:43-0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Maxim Konovalov wrote: >> >>> Synopsis: libc_r does not honor socket timeouts >>> >>> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed >>> State-Changed-By: maxim >>> State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 18 21:33:23 UTC 2006 >>> State-Changed-Why: >>> Superseded by threads/24472. >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20861 >> >> And I'll close threads/24472 because it has been superceded by >> libpthread and libthr unless you have other plans for it. > > Yep, I wonder about libc_r PRs state. We need to decide actually what > and when we are going to do with them. Kill them all right now? I'd vote for that :-) -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0604181751050.26624>