Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 21:45:06 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@qxnitro.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and ports Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232125050.77337@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAC8HS2GT0KZdXXv3VCRx291_E8es5uvmHwpzK==VtEuUK2=9dQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301122210240.11994@wonkity.com> <CAC8HS2FewOpz_SWmwMhz7m2TgW1T7YE%2BjPGPkcSJP-TPjJ9Qng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301131304290.17568@wonkity.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301152053070.78271@wonkity.com> <CAC8HS2GT0KZdXXv3VCRx291_E8es5uvmHwpzK==VtEuUK2=9dQ@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote: > For the 'make kernel' to force not using /etc/make.conf: > > make kernel __MAKE_CONF=/dev/null > > I think that's what the variable is called - I don't have a FreeBSD > handy to check. % make -V__MAKE_CONF /etc/make.conf Added. It does make the next sentence a bit redundant. It is also suggested that the kernel is built without any other special options, preferably with an empty /etc/make.conf. Offhand, I can't think of other special options to be given as alternate examples.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232125050.77337>
