Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:03:29 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, peter@wemm.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r270510 - head Message-ID: <842FF7CC-4851-4F05-96B6-92BB8B3CF28E@felyko.com> In-Reply-To: <201408242301.s7ON1N51056169@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <201408242301.s7ON1N51056169@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 24, 2014, at 16:01, Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > On 24 Aug, Rui Paulo wrote: >> On Aug 24, 2014, at 14:44, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>> On Sunday 24 August 2014 21:21:54 Don Lewis wrote: >>>> Author: truckman >>>> Date: Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014 >>>> New Revision: 270510 >>>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/270510 >>>>=20 >>>> Log: >>>> Catch up to gcc 3.3 -> 3.4 upgrade. >>>>=20 >>>> MFC after: 3 days >>>>=20 >>>> Modified: >>>> head/ObsoleteFiles.inc >>>>=20 >>>> Modified: head/ObsoleteFiles.inc >>>> = =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D >>>> =3D=3D --- head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sun Aug 24 19:31:26 2014 = (r270509) >>>> +++ head/ObsoleteFiles.inc Sun Aug 24 21:21:54 2014 = (r270510) >>>> @@ -3205,6 +3205,202 @@ OLD_FILES+=3Dlib/geom/geom_concat.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=3Dlib/geom/geom_label.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=3Dlib/geom/geom_nop.so.1 >>>> OLD_FILES+=3Dlib/geom/geom_stripe.so.1 >>>> +# 20040728: GCC 3.4.2 >>>> +OLD_DIRS+=3Dusr/include/c++/3.3 >>>> +OLD_FILES+=3Dusr/include/c++/3.3/FlexLexer.h >>>> +OLD_FILES+=3Dusr/include/c++/3.3/algorithm >>>> +OLD_FILES+=3Dusr/include/c++/3.3/backward/algo.h >>>=20 >>> I suspect that there's a story here that needs to be told.. >>=20 >> Yes, if it hasn't been a problem in 10 years, why do it now? >=20 > I found those leftovers on one of my machines. They are probably > harmless cruft, but I thought a few other folks might be in the same > situation. >=20 > One could argue that older entries should eventually get pruned. = We've > got stuff in there dating back to 1996 ... Right. I don't think we have a policy on this, so I can't argue against = your change.=20 -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?842FF7CC-4851-4F05-96B6-92BB8B3CF28E>