Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 08:27:35 -0400 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <200007051227.IAA81038@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 05 Jul 2000 00:04:12 PDT." <200007050704.AAA42641@john.baldwin.cx> References: <200007050704.AAA42641@john.baldwin.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Here is my proposal, adjusted a little as per suggestions. It attempts to
> follow these loose guidelines:
...
> net/ - move existing contents to net/base or something
> similar
> atalk/ - formerly sys/netatalk
> atm/ - formerly sys/netatm
> netgraph/ - formerly sys/netgraph
> ip/ - IPv4, IPv6, and IPsec bits from sys/netinet{,6}
> tcp/ - TCP " " " "
> udp/ - UDP " " " "
> ipx/ - formerly sys/netipx
> key/ - formerly sys/netkey
> natm/ - formerly sys/netnatm
> ncp/ - formerly sys/netncp
> ns/ - formerly sus/netns
> Notes:
> - There has been one vote so far to ditch the whole net/ reorg, although
> other people have expressed support for it.
Please take this as another vote to ditch the whole net/ reorg.
It's interesting that as this discussion is going on,the KAME folks are
merging the new IPv6 and IPSEC code into -current and comment that our
network code is much more different that the other BSD's. I'd hate to
see it diverge further unless there's a real compelling reason.
louie
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007051227.IAA81038>