Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:39:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225626] r325865 malloc vs bzero Message-ID: <bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225626 Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brooks@FreeBSD.org Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed --- Comment #1 from Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> --- I'd agree it's pointless, but there's seriously nothing wrong with the fix other than making a path that isn't performance relevant slightly slower. = If you want to submit a patch that would likely be fine. Bug reports aren't t= he places for this discussion. Note that memset should be used in preference to bzero as the compiler shou= ld be able to elide most of the cost of the memset since it can emit it inline= and then delete the dead stores. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z>