Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Feb 2018 17:39:38 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 225626] r325865 malloc vs bzero
Message-ID:  <bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-225626-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225626

Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |brooks@FreeBSD.org
         Resolution|---                         |Works As Intended
             Status|New                         |Closed

--- Comment #1 from Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org> ---
I'd agree it's pointless, but there's seriously nothing wrong with the fix
other than making a path that isn't performance relevant slightly slower.  =
If
you want to submit a patch that would likely be fine.  Bug reports aren't t=
he
places for this discussion.

Note that memset should be used in preference to bzero as the compiler shou=
ld
be able to elide most of the cost of the memset since it can emit it inline=
 and
then delete the dead stores.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225626-8-RsDlqNTq6z>