Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:58:48 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RAID-3? (was: cvs commit: src MAINTAINERS) Message-ID: <24879.1093031928@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:35:47 %2B0200." <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20040820193547.GZ30151@darkness.comp.waw.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek w rites: >As you can see RAID5 is only faster in READ tests for 15 and 100 processes >working in parallel. As I can see, RAID3 is faster in all the rest tests. > >PS. I wonder about read optimization, so parity component can be also > used for reading in round-robin fashion... I would far rather have an option to give me data-integrity checking ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24879.1093031928>