Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:57:04 +0400 From: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net> Cc: dikshie <dikshie@gmail.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: SUJ Going in to head today Message-ID: <n2qa31046fc1004270257k47ebd5cdo2f1537c3425c519@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004262001110.1398@desktop> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004201212340.1398@desktop> <h2h910e60e81004260642xd47c7604m934736aa321bebe2@mail.gmail.com> <l2ua31046fc1004260743l8bbb7b14jaad8227c6b0d7c40@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1004262001110.1398@desktop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 April 2010 10:01, Jeff Roberson <jroberson@jroberson.net> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, pluknet wrote: > >> On 26 April 2010 17:42, dikshie <dikshie@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jeff, >>> thanks for SUJ. >>> btw, why there is nan% utilization? and what does it mean? >>> -------------- >>> ** SU+J Recovering /dev/ad0s1g >>> ** Reading 33554432 byte journal from inode 4. >>> ** Building recovery table. >>> ** Resolving unreferenced inode list. >>> ** Processing journal entries. >>> ** 0 journal records in 0 bytes for nan% utilization <=3D=3D=3D=3D >>> ** Freed 0 inodes (0 dirs) 0 blocks, and 0 frags. >>> -------------- >>> >> >> That may be due to an empty journal (the only plausible version for me), >> so jrecs and jblocks are not updated. > > Yes, this is it exactly. =A0It's a simple bug, I will post a fix in the n= ext > few days. > > Thanks, > Jeff > While here, could you please look at my another su+j issue email? (to not create a new thread of the same thing). Thanks in advance. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-April/023303.html --=20 wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n2qa31046fc1004270257k47ebd5cdo2f1537c3425c519>