Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 May 2016 13:51:15 -0700
From:      "Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya)" <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        cem@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        Garrett Cooper <ngie@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r300868 - head/tools/tools/ioat
Message-ID:  <2F93033E-D202-4A0A-8555-76ED789D4080@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG6CVpUt425z_YyTb7E7TGDkTuZFpGDjz6N3JRg3Ksq6K6-ZuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201605272012.u4RKCWCI035708@repo.freebsd.org> <CAG6CVpUt425z_YyTb7E7TGDkTuZFpGDjz6N3JRg3Ksq6K6-ZuQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_6BA84278-B514-4E5B-9E9E-5774B6B528B6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8


> On May 27, 2016, at 13:34, Conrad Meyer <cem@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Garrett Cooper <ngie@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
>> Author: ngie
>> Date: Fri May 27 20:12:32 2016
>> New Revision: 300868
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300868
>>=20
>> Log:
>>  Remove note about bogus chain-len maximum
>>=20
>>  There's no current limit on chain-len with Broadwell DE chips; it =
isn't
>>  enforced in software, and there doesn't appear to be a hardware =
limitation
>>  either on the Intel Xeon D-1527 (Broadwell-DE) chip.
>=20
> Hi Ngie,
>=20
> The note isn't bogus, it's just not what you think it is=E2=80=94the =
limit is
> in the ioat_test code, not a limit of the hardware.
>=20
> Before this commit which documented it (r289733), the limit *was* 4.
> However, in the same commit I bumped the limit up to 128
> (IOAT_MAX_BUFS / 2).  (I suspect I wrote the documentation first,
> before deciding to raise the limit.)
>=20
> So the current limit is 128, and should be documented.

Ah=E2=80=A6 that makes sense. Would it be a better idea to make this =
limit into a readonly sysctl in ioat_test(4), along with the other =
limits? If so, I=E2=80=99ll put that out for CR.
Thanks,
-Ngie

--Apple-Mail=_6BA84278-B514-4E5B-9E9E-5774B6B528B6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=O5xs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_6BA84278-B514-4E5B-9E9E-5774B6B528B6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2F93033E-D202-4A0A-8555-76ED789D4080>