Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 04:26:51 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r266238 - head/contrib/ldns/ldns Message-ID: <86ppjdjg2c.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20140517112645.N925@besplex.bde.org> (Bruce Evans's message of "Sat, 17 May 2014 11:46:16 %2B1000 (EST)") References: <201405161532.s4GFWGvh006504@svn.freebsd.org> <20140517112645.N925@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> writes: > -Wcast-qual is especially onerous in contrib'ed code written to a lower > standard. Well, I could have just lowered WARNS... LDNS actually isn't that bad. Unbound is much worse. > Converting this to use system endianness conversion functions wouldn't > take much more churn. Do our standard endianness conversion functions handle unaligned accesses? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ppjdjg2c.fsf>