Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 08:20:45 -0700 From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org>, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] RELNOTESng for 5-CURRENT Message-ID: <200104271520.f3RFKjf49815@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <20010426195815.B77194@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> References: <200104241603.f3OG3AB06290@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010426103003.A52781@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <200104261658.f3QGwhs37643@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010426195815.B77194@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] [dropping -current] If memory serves me right, Nik Clayton wrote: [bmah: Doesn't like partial branching of doc/.] > I don't either (just because I suggest something doesn't mean I always > think it's the best way). :-) > At the end of the day, you're the guy doing the work. . . Sure has been a long day....I think it started around BSDCon. :-) I'm going to try an experiment with stylesheets for the architecture-dependent stuff (based on your osmin=/osmax= prototype). If it works, then great. If not, I'll probably revisit it later, and I'll probably ask you for some more help with this. Either way I'm hoping to get all this committed RSN, like today or this weekend. Thanks! Bruce. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 iD8DBQE66Y5N2MoxcVugUsMRAk1eAJ0U4by0jgn7OKaZBXXwXKGp2jIwswCg84Nh Ewea3iMfPe+FUG8xWF6vQJ0= =KoJG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200104271520.f3RFKjf49815>