Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:02:57 -0200 From: Jean Milanez Melo <jmelo@freebsdbrasil.com.br> To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.org, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Handling non-standard directories in tinybsd Message-ID: <453F5271.70309@freebsdbrasil.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20061025104306.GI20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20061024100641.GB20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <453DE863.7070305@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20061024115727.GD20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <453E1FBC.5060700@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <20061025104306.GI20405@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremie Le Hen wrote: to workdir. Suggestions? > > Well, this is a neat idea. However I think this is not homogeneous in > regard to the current behaviour of TinyBSD: while the base system would > still be included on a per-file basis, library dependencies being > brought in automatically, using pkg_add(1) for third-party apps would > lead to include the whole package, including manpages, documentation, > configuration files along with the binaries. Moreover, this may not be > a desirable behaviour for an embedded system. > Yes, but my idea was install it on temporary directory and remove all unnecessary files. > My feeling is that TinyBSD has used the KISS principle so far. The code > as well as the configuration is somewhat raw (no offence here), but it is > thereby easy to use, debug and modify at needs. I am going to code this > in my source tree this afternoon and I will be glad to provide you the > patch. > That's right, make tinybsd simpler is really our idea :) Send to me your patch and i'll take a look. Thanks Jean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?453F5271.70309>