Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 22:42:39 +1000 From: Antony Mawer <lists@mawer.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern.geom.debugflags=16 does NOT allow me to write to device Message-ID: <p2zea2d4a5b1004230542x90b36946ode874e6b8340a874@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4BD191CF.40106@icyb.net.ua> References: <y2z5a1151761004221355l391c05f4qc6c0f760321b56f5@mail.gmail.com> <20100423082345.GA27379@icarus.home.lan> <4BD1615E.9010909@yandex.ru> <r2h5a1151761004230334p1f8be0cdv93c3cacf00882c2f@mail.gmail.com> <4BD191CF.40106@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> wrote: > on 23/04/2010 13:34 Peter Schuller said the following: >>> It's easy. >> >> Thank you for posting the example. I never really understood that >> gpart was to be the generic tool; I thought it was gpt specific. >> Obviously I should have read up better. >> >> Is gpart to be considered "tested", "stable", "production quality" >> and/or "default" now then, or is it still cutting edge/experimental? > > Yes, it's "tested", "stable", "production quality" and/or "default". ... > gpart is the way to go and is the best tool to use on recent FreeBSD. Agreed. Having just gone through updating $work's installer to use gpart instead, it makes partitioning so much more pleasant and consistent than previous tools... --Antony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p2zea2d4a5b1004230542x90b36946ode874e6b8340a874>