Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:05:24 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: COMPAT_FREEBSDn
Message-ID:  <7d6fde3d0904262005k4f94321cp32961e1853f96cc0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49F41D20.6050601@gwdg.de>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904251221410.45295@ibyngvyr.purzvxnyf.bet> <49F41D20.6050601@gwdg.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> wrote:
> For example if you are using x11/nvidia-driver you have to install
> misc/compat5x for the binary part of the driver. There may be some more
> ports like this.
>
> Rainer Hurling
>
>
> On 25.04.2009 19:25 (UTC+2), Wes Morgan wrote:
>>
>> The various COMPAT_FREEBSDn options are part of generic, but are they
>> needed for most users? Do they enable some structures or interfaces that
>> some userland programs still expect, or is it safe to disable them assuming
>> that I don't need to run binaries from older systems?

There are a few ports, but they're low in rank.

compat4x is essentially useless with all that I've seen, but other
apps in the ports I've seen require compat5x (nvidia-driver, perforce,
etc)...

Cheers,
-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7d6fde3d0904262005k4f94321cp32961e1853f96cc0>