Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:28:34 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ? Message-ID: <20111205222834.GA50285@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <2D87D847-A2B7-4E77-B6C1-61D73C9F582F@digsys.bg> References: <20111205192703.GA49118@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <2D87D847-A2B7-4E77-B6C1-61D73C9F582F@digsys.bg>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > - have two machines connected by a 10G link > > - on one run "nuttcp -S" > > - on the other one run "nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip" > > > > Any particular tuning of FreeBSD? actually my point is first to see how good or bad are the defaults. I have noticed that setting hw.ixgbe.max_interrupt_rate=0 (it is a tunable, you need to do it before loading the module) improves the throughput by a fair amount (but still way below line rate with 1500 byte packets). other things (larger windows) don't seem to help much. cheers luigihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111205222834.GA50285>