Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:59:01 +0800 From: David Xu <listlog2011@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r232209 - in head: lib/libthr/thread sys/kern Message-ID: <4F4C42F5.2070006@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAF-QHFWA6byF6RcDDMpbAm3UhnwV%2BB2TW1jP1L85%2BzWYt-PLkA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201202271338.q1RDcqEQ020033@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF-QHFWA6byF6RcDDMpbAm3UhnwV%2BB2TW1jP1L85%2BzWYt-PLkA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012/2/27 22:29, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 27 February 2012 14:38, David Xu<davidxu@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Author: davidxu >> Date: Mon Feb 27 13:38:52 2012 >> New Revision: 232209 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232209 >> >> Log: >> Follow changes made in revision 232144, pass absolute timeout to kernel, >> this eliminates a clock_gettime() syscall. > Any chance of a MFC? > > I use rwlocks a lot; removing a syscall from all operations looks like > a nice improvement. > Yes, I will do a MFC when it is ready. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4C42F5.2070006>