Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 07:41:14 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What replaces csup? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209180733410.65590@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGBmCT6Y8%2BwMUWrjDZUqJyFHUowCd80we3Wgx-dGZg1Sqav16w@mail.gmail.com> References: <D97788AE24B7FFB0C79AA6FB@localhost> <k38bct$ang$1@ger.gmane.org> <780066C6E2FAB67A997876B7@Pauls-MacBook-Pro.local> <20567.50041.903201.979498@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1209172102400.26215@wonkity.com> <CAGBmCT6Y8%2BwMUWrjDZUqJyFHUowCd80we3Wgx-dGZg1Sqav16w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, pete wright wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: >> >> csup updates just the files that have changed without all the overhead. svn >> export can get a copy of all the current files, but it copies all of them >> every time, not just the changes. >> > > yea i agree with you. i wonder if it would be worth the effort of > sharing a svn export via rsync or httpd to make fetching delta's > easier and/or more efficient from a base install? It's an interesting idea. If the repository files were directly accessible in a filesystem, that filesystem could be shared with rsyncd and some exclude settings without needing an export at all. With svn bdb, the files are not directly accessible, but I don't know for fsfs. Probably not, so a periodic export would still be required.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1209180733410.65590>